Thursday, January 17, 2008
Richard J. Weinberg, Presiding Judge
CITY OF AURORA – MUNICIPAL COURT
14999 East Alameda Parkway
Aurora, Colorado 80012 - 1547
Re: January 16, 2008 – Response Regarding Complaint Case Number Z11295
Mr. Weinberg:
It is important to clarify … at least for the public record … a response to your letter of January 16, 2008, which politely sets aside any culpability in wrong doing by Judge Allen Stein … from a complaint filed with the Judicial Review Committee, and through my correspondence to the City Attorney Charlie Richardson and Judge Stein himself.
I believe it extremely important in reminding you that; had Judge Stein chosen to conduct himself and speak, without screaming at the onset of the arraignment … unmistakably displaying his ill tempered manner and bullying tactics before any advisement began … I am certain it would have turned out differently. Perhaps you should reexamine the beginning of the audio and written transcripts (if they have not been already altered), and you will see how Judge Stein dictated the tone for that arraignment.
You are correct; I was unhappy with the nature of the proceedings, but … only after Judge Stein became enraged and upset because I had not signed the document provided by the court, “Advisement of Rights” and threatening me with incarceration if I did not sign the document. It was only then, did Judge Stein begin his oral advisement and could not accept an answer that, while I was aware of his advisement, I did not choose to understand them … for reasons that are becoming more known to me as we parry about jurisdictional questions.
I recall asking Judge Stein in open court, “Do I have the right to say no?” and his answer … while being an affirmative ‘yes,’ was followed by a threat of incarceration if I did say no. I am certain you may understand the conflict any reasonably intelligent person may have with an answer so contradictory in nature.
It was not good enough for Judge Stein to accept that I agreed of being advised of my rights, he instead had to ‘bull dog’ me into accepting that I be made to understand them, in trying to bring me under his jurisdiction, when I clearly said, “NO.”
I do not believe no matter how intelligent you may believe me to be … gives you, nor Judge Stein the opinion that I should be ‘Made to Understand Anything.’
It was all too clear that Judge Stein had every intention of gaining jurisdiction over me through his tyrannical methods, even as I politely declined to accept any documents, or wished to sign anything … all while being subjected to his continued ‘Bad Manners and Personality,’ and being ordered, “You will accept the documents and carry them from this courtroom … or find yourself in contempt.”
Once I had been illegally detained, the only opportunity in securing my release from Judge Stein’s false imprisonment was to “orally capitulate” to an affirmative answer, which was definitely against any freedom of my rights as a Sovereign. Who gave him the right to do that? It was not I … since I never gave him that authority ‘Over Me.’
As you know, the only reason for the court system is to protect and preserve my rights under the organic constitution of these United States, the State and its municipalities. The City did not, and still does not … have any standing on bringing any charge against me, since there is no ‘Injured Party’ who can rightfully bring a claim.
While I do clearly understand and acknowledge the Judge had advised me of any rights, it does not and will not fall upon any court … to force me in understanding them … if there are questions still unanswered in my own mind.
Judge Stein’s bad temper and absolute authority in his court felt as if he could quash another constituent into submission.
Had I agreed to accept an extorted plea deal, and accept a ‘Guilty Plea’ and pay a fine, I would now be saddled with a criminal record for a simple ‘Courtesy Violation’ issued by a City employee bent on harassing me … knowing I had already responded on several occasions, through certified mailings of compliance. There was absolutely no reason why I should have been in Judge Stein’s courtroom in the first place.
I refuse to be treated in this manner or any manner restricting my ability of living in peace and freedom, or being forced against ‘My Will’ when I remain in subjugation to only one authority. I have done nothing wrong, and your letter absolving your associate while casting aspersions on my character does nothing more than laying the groundwork for your colleague’s continued actions on innocent people, who do not know any better.
Respectfully,
Mason Ramsey
cc: Judge Stein
15881 East Girard Place
Aurora, Colorado 80013
Tel: (303) 766-0475
masonmil@comcast.net
No comments:
Post a Comment